Fuchs, Z., Polinsky, Yards., and you will Scontras, G. (2015). The newest differential signal regarding matter and you will sex during the Spanish. Linguist. Rev. 32, 703–737.
Hartsuiker, R., Schriefers, H., Bock, K., and you can Kikstra, G. M. (2003). Morphophonological affects towards framework out-of topic-verb contract. Mem. Cogn. 31, 1316–1326.
Heycock, C., and you will Zamparelli, R. (2005). Relatives and you will colleagues: plurality, dexterity, as well as the structure regarding DP. Nat. Lang. thirteen, 201–270.
Hinojosa, J., Martin-Loeches, M., Casado, P., Munoz, F., and you will Rubia, F. (2003). Parallels and differences between phrase structure and you may morphosyntactic violations within the Foreign-language: a meeting-related potentials studies. Lang. Cogn. Processes. 18, 113–142.
Igoa, J. Meters., Garcia-Albea, J. Elizabeth., and you will Sanches-Casas, Roentgen. (1999). Gender-number dissociation when you look at the phrase design from inside the Spanish. Ital. J. Linguist. 11, 163–196.
Krstev, C., and Vitas, D. (2005). “Corpus. and you may Lexicon – Common Incompletness,” in the Procedures of Corpus Linguistics Conference, eds P. Danielsson and Yards. Wagenmakers, Liverpool.
Malko, A beneficial., and Slioussar, Letter. (2013). “Interest errors in the intercourse agreement: Research out of Russian,” inside Proceedings Formal Ways to Slavic Linguistics: The third Indiana Meeting, eds S. Franks, et al. (Ann Arbor: Michigan College Drive), 162–175.
). “History conjunct agreement in the Slovenian,” for the Process out of Official Approaches to Slavic linguistics 2006, eds Rpton, Meters. Goledzinowska, and you may You. Savchenko (Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Products), 210-227.
Mitic, I., and you will Arsenijevic, B. (2019). Structural ambiguity and you can optionality away from agreement activities when you look at the Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian conjunct agreement. A good J. Gen. Linguist. 4:six.
Nevins, An excellent., Dillon, B., Malhotra, S., and Phillips, C. (2007). The brand new part away from feature-number and show-enter in handling Hindi verb arrangement abuses. Brain Res. 1164, 81–94.
Puskar, Z., and Murphy, A great. (2015). “Closest conjunct arrangement from inside the serbo-croatian: a rule-buying membership,” during the Topics in the InfL. Linguistische Arbeitsberichte (LAB), Vol. ninety-five, eds A. Assmann, S. Lender, D. Georgi, T. Klein, P. Weisser, and you may E. Zimmermann (Leipzig: Universitat Leipzig), 441–482.
Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., and you will Garrett, M. F. (1996). Subject-verb contract for the Spanish and you may English: variations in the brand new part off conceptual limits. Cognition 61, 261–298.
Semant
Willer-Gold, J., Arsenijevic, B., Batinic, Yards., Becker, Meters., Cordalija, N., Kresic, Meters., et al. (2018). When linearity prevails over hierarchy within the sentence structure. PNAS 115, 495–five hundred. doi: /pnas.1712729115
New five logically you can easily combos as well as their properties was portrayed into the (21)
Willer-Gold, J., Arsenijevic, B., Batinic, Meters., Cordalija, N., Kresic, M., Leko, Letter., mais aussi al. (2016). Morphosyntactic creation of control agreement in South Slavic–a relative investigation. J. Slavic Linguist. 24, 187–224.
That it area clarifies specific technology concerns about your options manufactured in the style of all of our check out, into the white of your unique properties out-of South carolina morphology. It is aligned mainly of these wanting new theoretic and you can descriptive linguistic, instead of psycholinguistic aspects of the research.
Inside our fresh design, you will find capitalized toward proven fact that inside the South carolina NSg nouns stop either in -e or perhaps in -o, and this the plural leads to -a good, while you are at the same time FSg nouns end in -a great, as well as their plural models lead to -e. It production a entered, yet , partial syncretism.
The combination away from NSg and FPl makes it possible for the synthesis of limited pairs anywhere between an excellent syncretic and you will a low-syncretic pair of nouns, while the mixture of NPl and you can FSg enables singular opportunity, that’s syncretic.
We made use of limited sets such as (20a) within crucial stimulus. The fresh new selected option, but not, allows a few sandwich-choices, dependent on and therefore gender–count integration comes because the earliest, and you will and this because the history conjunct. This is determined by various other equivalent consideration.
The fresh new verb bears the newest endings: -o getting NSg, -a towards NPl and you can FSg, or -age to possess FPl – we.age., you are able to distinguish NSg away from FPl for the verb. As a result, aside from the unambiguously default male ending -we, whenever good verb for the -age is actually introduced, we had been certain that it actually was FPl, just in case good verb inside -o are put, i know that it was NSg. But you can find out more not, whenever an excellent verb inside -an is produced – it had been unsure if it is plural, agreeing in the gender with the basic conjunct (NPl), otherwise it had been one and you may concurred into the sex towards history conjunct (FSg).